Control-by-control evaluation of all 110 NIST 800-171 requirements against your actual infrastructure. Know exactly where you stand — and what it will take to get ready — before committing to a remediation program.
Most gap analyses are questionnaires. An assessor asks whether you have a policy for each control area, someone answers yes or no, and a spreadsheet is generated. That approach does not predict what a C3PAO assessor will find.
A technically grounded gap analysis evaluates each of the 110 NIST 800-171 requirements against actual evidence: configuration exports from your cloud environments, access control records, audit log settings, MFA enforcement status, encryption state, patch levels, and network segmentation between CUI and non-CUI systems.
The output is a gap report that matches what a C3PAO assessor would find in your environment — ranked by SPRS point impact so you know which gaps to close first.
Where CUI flows through your environment and what falls in or out of scope.
Each requirement rated Met, Partially Met, or Not Met against technical evidence.
Current-state SPRS score based on actual implementation, not self-reported status.
Open gaps ordered by SPRS point impact so high-value controls get addressed first.
Realistic remediation timeline per control based on your infrastructure platform.
Evidence-based. Each step pulls from your actual infrastructure, not from your policy binder.
Collect configuration exports, network diagrams, existing policies, and access to cloud management consoles. Identify CUI locations and system boundary before evaluating a single control.
Each of the 110 controls evaluated against technical evidence. Configuration settings, audit log states, MFA status, patch levels, and network segmentation all checked directly.
Calculate your current-state SPRS score. Map each open gap to its SPRS point value. Identify any controls with False Claims Act exposure if your current submission is inflated.
Written gap report with all findings, SPRS score, and a remediation roadmap ranked by assessment risk and implementation effort. Delivered with a readout session to walk through every finding.
What contractors ask before starting a gap analysis engagement.
End-to-end readiness: gap analysis, IaC remediation, SSP development, and C3PAO assessment preparation.
Validate your SPRS submission against actual technical implementation. Identify exposure before a C3PAO assessor does.
All 110 controls implemented in your infrastructure using IaC after the gap analysis defines what needs to be built.
Before you commit budget to remediation, know exactly what you're remediating. A 30-minute call is enough to scope the engagement and set a realistic timeline.
Schedule a Free Gap Analysis ConversationVirtual Infrastructure Services LLC · South Brunswick, NJ · +1 (732) 200-7352